Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Garlinghouse results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 651 hits . Analysis detected 3,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,154 of 37,536 keywords). This Brad Garlinghouse is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group. Brad Garlinghouse
Keyword details
Total words: 2,404
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.3% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst