Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bowl Opt Outs results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 614 hits . Analysis detected 4,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,638 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,999 of 37,536 keywords). This Bowl Opt Outs is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Bowl Opt Outs
Keyword details
Total words: 1,638
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.7% percentile 9.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 37.5% 37.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 25.2% 25.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 24.5% 24.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 23.6% 23.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 19.1% 19.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Keyword 37.5%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 25.2%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst