Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Bob Corker results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Bob Corker is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Bob Corker
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Bob Corker (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos