Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Blindside Divorce results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 556 hits. Analysis detected 4,577 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Blindside Divorce is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Blindside Divorce
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Blindside Divorce (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos