Keyword summary
13%2 analyzed articles/videos5,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blackness results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 874 hits. Analysis detected 7,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,675 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,343 of 37,536 keywords). This Blackness is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Blackness
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
4%Blackness (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 15,675
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751003.2% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos