Keyword summary
8%4 analyzed articles/videos1,361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Big Bear Valley results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 596 hits. Analysis detected 5,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,230 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (33,886 of 36,714 keywords). This Big Bear Valley is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Big Bear Valley
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
8%Big Bear Valley (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,230
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751007.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate