Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Bezos Earth Fund results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 353 hits . Analysis detected 2,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,499 keywords). This Bezos Earth Fund is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Bezos Earth Fund
Keyword details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.6% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst