Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Bezos Earth Fund results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 353 hits. Analysis detected 2,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,499 keywords). This Bezos Earth Fund is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Bezos Earth Fund
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Bezos Earth Fund (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.6%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos