Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Better Get Baquero results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 676 hits . Analysis detected 1,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,067 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Better Get Baquero is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Better Get Baquero
Keyword details
Total words: 2,067
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 32.7% 32.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 32.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst