Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Best Cities In The World results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Pessimism Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 345 hits. Analysis detected 2,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (29,357 of 37,536 keywords). This Best Cities In The World is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Best Cities In The World
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,564
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos