Keyword summary
78% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Lamm results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 610 hits . Analysis detected 4,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,631 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,197 of 37,536 keywords). This Ben Lamm is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Ben Lamm
Keyword details
Total words: 3,631
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst