Keyword summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 5,034 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Belt And Road Initiative results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,795 hits . Analysis detected 17,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,136 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,788 of 37,536 keywords). This Belt And Road Initiative is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Belt And Road Initiative
Keyword details
Total words: 20,136
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles20.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst