Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bayview Hunters Point results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 2,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,496 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,580 of 37,536 keywords). This Bayview Hunters Point is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Bayview Hunters Point
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
24%Bayview Hunters Point (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,496
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos