Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bayview Hunters Point results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 314 hits . Analysis detected 2,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,496 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,580 of 37,536 keywords). This Bayview Hunters Point is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Bayview Hunters Point
Keyword details
Total words: 4,496
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst