Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bay Area Sports results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 370 hits . Analysis detected 1,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,522 of 37,536 keywords). This Bay Area Sports is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Bay Area Sports
Keyword details
Total words: 2,588
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.3% No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst