Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bay Area Air Quality Management District results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 1,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,441 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (19,656 of 37,536 keywords). This Bay Area Air Quality Management District is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510047.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos