Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Banking Fraud results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Quote-first Misdirection , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 388 hits . Analysis detected 2,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,898 of 37,533 keywords). This Banking Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Banking Fraud
Keyword details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst