Keyword summary
76% 2 analyzed articles/videos 253 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bab Al Mandab Strait results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 602 hits . Analysis detected 4,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,023 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,780 of 37,536 keywords). This Bab Al Mandab Strait is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Bab Al Mandab Strait
Keyword details
Total words: 4,023
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst