Keyword summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bab Al Mandab results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 513 hits . Analysis detected 3,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,403 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,486 of 37,536 keywords). This Bab Al Mandab is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. Bab Al Mandab
Keyword details
Total words: 2,403
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.1% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst