Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Az 06 Election results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 761 hits. Analysis detected 4,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,274 of 37,536 keywords). This Az 06 Election is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Az 06 Election
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
81%Az 06 Election (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,740
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 27.8%27.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 27.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos