Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Avocados results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 2,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,128 of 36,716 keywords). This Avocados is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Avocados
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
81%Avocados (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,668
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.5%7.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos