Keyword summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Avatar Fire And Ash results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 1,183 hits. Analysis detected 6,877 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,891 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (13,757 of 37,536 keywords). This Avatar Fire And Ash is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Avatar Fire And Ash
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠64%Avatar Fire And Ash (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,891
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 24.2%24.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos