Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Australian Food And Drink results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 360 hits. Analysis detected 1,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (21,246 of 37,536 keywords). This Australian Food And Drink is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Australian Food And Drink
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,940
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510043.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos