Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Aurora Avenue results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 2,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Aurora Avenue is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Aurora Avenue
Keyword details
Total words: 4,596
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst