Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Attorney General Dana Nessel results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 1,308 hits . Analysis detected 5,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,981 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,675 keywords). This Attorney General Dana Nessel is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Attorney General Dana Nessel
Keyword details
Total words: 3,981
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 32.9% 32.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 32.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst