Keyword summary
62%1 analyzed article/video1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attorney General Brian Schwalb results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 2,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 54% (26,307 of 56,863 keywords). This Attorney General Brian Schwalb is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Attorney General Brian Schwalb
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
54%Attorney General Brian Schwalb (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,008
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos