Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ato Quayson results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 397 hits . Analysis detected 3,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,445 of 37,536 keywords). This Ato Quayson is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group. Ato Quayson
Keyword details
Total words: 4,348
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst