Keyword summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Assembly Bill 302 results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 494 hits . Analysis detected 3,375 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,127 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,587 of 35,179 keywords). This Assembly Bill 302 is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Assembly Bill 302
Keyword details
Total words: 2,127
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.1% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.2% 23.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst