Keyword summary
45%1 analyzed article/video1,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Assembly Bill 1776 results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 520 hits. Analysis detected 3,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,759 of 37,536 keywords). This Assembly Bill 1776 is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Assembly Bill 1776
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
29%Assembly Bill 1776 (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

29% percentile
025507510028.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos