Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashrei Foundation results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 349 hits. Analysis detected 2,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,554 of 37,536 keywords). This Ashrei Foundation is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Ashrei Foundation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
46%Ashrei Foundation (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,772
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos