Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Arthur Engoron results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Self-Serving Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 609 hits . Analysis detected 2,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,540 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Arthur Engoron is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Arthur Engoron
Keyword details
Total words: 2,540
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst