Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Art And Design Books results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 1,513 hits. Analysis detected 5,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,453 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (22,903 of 37,536 keywords). This Art And Design Books is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Art And Design Books
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
39%Art And Design Books (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,453
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510039.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 23.4%23.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos