Keyword summary
82%3 analyzed articles/videos3,038 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arms Embargo results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 4,932 hits. Analysis detected 32,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,112 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,559 of 37,536 keywords). This Arms Embargo is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Arms Embargo
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
24%Arms Embargo (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 33,112
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles33.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos