Keyword summary
4%1 analyzed article/video3,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arkansas River results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 443 hits. Analysis detected 2,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,486 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (37,079 of 37,358 keywords). This Arkansas River is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Arkansas River
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
1%Arkansas River (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,486
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751000.7% percentile
0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos