Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ariel Sharon results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 594 hits. Analysis detected 2,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (23,878 of 34,798 keywords). This Ariel Sharon is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
Ariel Sharon
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
32%Ariel Sharon (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,004
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510031.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos