Keyword summary
48% 1 analyzed article/video 316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Argument results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 267 hits . Analysis detected 836 faulty-reasoning hits from 948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,939 of 37,536 keywords). This Argument is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Argument
Keyword details
Total words: 948
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.5% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles948 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 28.2% 28.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anecdotal: Keyword 28.2%, sitewide 5.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Red Herring: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst