Keyword summary
â 33% 1 analyzed article/video 1,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arctic Warming results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 325 hits . Analysis detected 2,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,957 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 22% (29,578 of 37,536 keywords). This Arctic Warming is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Arctic Warming
Keyword details
Total words: 3,957
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Fundamental Attribution E⌠Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst