Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apologia For Terrorism results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 1,930 hits . Analysis detected 8,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ā 41% (21,087 of 35,712 keywords). This Apologia For Terrorism is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group. Apologia For Terrorism
Keyword details
Total words: 9,100
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.2% 21.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst