Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ap Investigations results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 643 hits. Analysis detected 3,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,764 of 37,536 keywords). This Ap Investigations is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Ap Investigations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
37%Ap Investigations (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos