Keyword summary
35% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antitrust Law results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 741 hits . Analysis detected 5,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,478 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,998 of 37,536 keywords). This Antitrust Law is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Antitrust Law
Keyword details
Total words: 7,478
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst