Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antioch results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,002 hits. Analysis detected 5,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,434 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,278 of 37,536 keywords). This Antioch is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Antioch
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
17%Antioch (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,434
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate