Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anti Inflammatory Diet results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 1,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (33,800 of 35,936 keywords). This Anti Inflammatory Diet is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Anti Inflammatory Diet
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
6%Anti Inflammatory Diet (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,556
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

6% percentile
02550751005.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos