Keyword summary
21% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Rescue results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 1,238 hits . Analysis detected 14,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,563 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,707 of 37,536 keywords). This Animal Rescue is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Animal Rescue
Keyword details
Total words: 25,563
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles25.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst