Keyword summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Conflict results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Negativity Bias , and Composition/Division , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 451 hits . Analysis detected 2,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,561 of 35,675 keywords). This Animal Conflict is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Animal Conflict
Keyword details
Total words: 2,244
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 4.6% Composition/Division: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst