Keyword summary
49% 3 analyzed articles/videos 747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Attacks results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 1,191 hits . Analysis detected 4,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,389 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,122 of 37,536 keywords). This Animal Attacks is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. Animal Attacks
Keyword details
Total words: 4,389
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.0% percentile 4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 27.1% 27.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst