Keyword summary
61%3 analyzed articles/videos1,775 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angie Craig results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 879 hits. Analysis detected 6,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,235 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,660 of 37,536 keywords). This Angie Craig is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Angie Craig
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
27%Angie Craig (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,235
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos