Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Warhol results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 1,513 hits . Analysis detected 5,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,453 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (22,902 of 37,536 keywords). This Andy Warhol is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Andy Warhol
Keyword details
Total words: 6,453
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 23.4% 23.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst