Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Mccarthy results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 253 hits . Analysis detected 1,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (33,268 of 35,718 keywords). This Andrew Mccarthy is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Andrew Mccarthy
Keyword details
Total words: 4,316
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst