Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,254 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Garfield results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 1,510 hits . Analysis detected 9,928 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,244 of 37,536 keywords). This Andrew Garfield is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Andrew Garfield
Keyword details
Total words: 5,016
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.7% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.9% 23.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.4% 20.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 30.1% 30.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst