Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Bailey results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 485 hits . Analysis detected 2,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,450 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,860 of 37,536 keywords). This Andrew Bailey is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Andrew Bailey
Keyword details
Total words: 2,450
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.7% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst