Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Mathers results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Unattributed Quote , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 143 hits . Analysis detected 1,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,823 of 37,536 keywords). This Amy Mathers is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Amy Mathers
Keyword details
Total words: 2,712
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst