Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Americans For Immigrant Justice results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 706 hits . Analysis detected 4,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ā 83% (6,499 of 37,536 keywords). This Americans For Immigrant Justice is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Americans For Immigrant Justice
Keyword details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.7% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning ā¦ Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.4% 27.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst